Introduction to
Philosophy Mr. Pendergast
Rationalists v.
Empiricists
Rationalists – Our
knowledge of the world is acquired by the use of reason, and our senses are not
to be trusted. Believed
that we can have knowledge without experience.
|
Philosopher |
Background & Works |
Three (3) Main Ideas |
||
|
Rene Descartes 1596 - 1650 |
§
Born in §
Educated by
Jesuits §
Joined the
army §
Settled in §
Discourse on Method §
Meditations §
Father of “Modern Philosopher” – epistemology –
“What ca I know?” |
3 Stages in search of “indubitable” premises: (87) 1. Can I trust my senses?
NO 2. Am I awake or dreaming? 3. “Malignant Spirit
trying to deceive me? THEREFORE: 4. “Cogito ergo sum!” |
Ontological
Argument for existence of God: (87) |
Mind and Matter –
“Cartesian Dualism” – (88) The world consists of two different
kinds of substance – Mind &
Matter |
|
Benedict Spinoza 1632-1677 |
•
Born in •
Expelled from
Orthodox Jewish community at 24 •
Lens grinder •
1673 – offered prof.
at •
“higher criticism” of scriptures. •
Ethics |
Science v. Free Will (91) 2. Also – Is there a place
for God in such a system? |
•
Denied dualism
– if God – the “uncaused cause” - is infinite, he cannot have boundaries.
God is not outside the world, but He is not in the world either: He is the
world. (92) |
•
In a
rationally governed society, “every man may think what he likes and say what
he thinks.” (94) •
We should look
at our own lives sub specie aeternitatis (in the eyes of eternity).
(94) |
|
Gottfried Leibniz 164-1716 |
•
Invented
Calculus, Kinetic energy, Mathematical Logic •
Son of
Philosophy Prof. •
1673 –
offered prof. at U of •
Friendship
with King George I of •
Absent
minded professor |
All truths belong to 2
logical types: either (1) We examine facts to determine whether “synthetic”
statements are true, or (2) We can analyze with-out looking outside with
“analytic statements.” (97) |
Notion of “compossibilities” – why a perfect God has created a world in which there is so much evil. (98) |
“Principle of sufficient reason” led to
theory of “monads.” (99) |
Empiricists - thought
we can only be sure of something once we’ve tested it – once we’ve experienced
it.
|
Philosopher |
Background |
Three (3) Main Ideas |
||
|
John Locke 1632-1704 |
•
•
Joined
opposition to King Charles II •
4 Years in
France – Studied Descartes •
In •
Escorted
Queen Mary home after Glorious Revolution |
Theory of knowledge:
What are the limits to what is intelligible to humans? (103) |
Our senses are the only
direct interface between ourselves and reality external to us. (104) |
1.
“Primary” &
“Secondary” qualities of objects (106 – 107) 2. Sovereignty ultimately remains with the people. (107) |
|
George 1685-1753 |
•
•
Bishop
Berkeley •
American
Colonies – Yale •
|
When he said he
believed in independent “material substance,” Locke was breaking fundamental
principle of empiricism. (111) |
What exists
are minds and their contents, or subjects and their experiences. No grounds for believing in existence of
anything else. (111) |
Total reality exists in
the mind of God, and infinite spirit, who has created us finite spirits.
(111) |
|
David Hume 1711-1776 |
•
le bon
David” in •
“Saint
David” in •
Economist
– close friends with Adam
Smith •
Dialogues
Concerning Natural Religions – best work – undermined all the then most attractive arguments for
the existence of God |
God & “self” - to be
justified in claiming the existence of these things, we have to point to
evidence from our experience. (113) |
Advocated “mitigated scepticism.” (115) |
If we can’t be certain of
anything, how ridiculous to think we have answer to everything! (116) |
|
Edmund Burke 1729-1797 |
•
Protestant
Irishman •
•
Law courts
I •
Author
& Journalist •
House of
Commons @ 37 •
MP is a
Rep. not a •
Reflections
on the Revolution in |
A developed society is
so big and so complicated that a single mind cannot possibly contain it all
and understand it. (118) |
The only acceptable
mode of political change is organic, not revolutionary. (118) |
Great art strives after
the infinite, and the infinite, having no bounds, can never be clear or
distinct. (119) |